Genevieve Gardner Portfolio Project

Genevieve Gardner Portfolio ProjectGenevieve Gardner Portfolio ProjectGenevieve Gardner Portfolio Project
Home
Menu
  • Customized eBook
  • 3D Printer Grant
  • Teacher's Tech Toolkit
  • AAC
  • SMARTboard Modifications
  • Adaptive Hardware Prezi
  • Technology Infographic

Genevieve Gardner Portfolio Project

Genevieve Gardner Portfolio ProjectGenevieve Gardner Portfolio ProjectGenevieve Gardner Portfolio Project
Home
Menu
  • Customized eBook
  • 3D Printer Grant
  • Teacher's Tech Toolkit
  • AAC
  • SMARTboard Modifications
  • Adaptive Hardware Prezi
  • Technology Infographic
More
  • Home
  • Menu
    • Customized eBook
    • 3D Printer Grant
    • Teacher's Tech Toolkit
    • AAC
    • SMARTboard Modifications
    • Adaptive Hardware Prezi
    • Technology Infographic
  • Home
  • Menu

Augmentative & Alternative Communication (AAC)

Compare a range of AAC options available to consumers by focusing on the needs of each individual student.

Integrating AAC in the Classroom

AAC is defined by Beukelman and Light (2020) as a range of systems, services, and technologies designed to meet the needs of people with complex communication needs. According to a UK study on the prevalence of AAC, the most common conditions of users that would benefit from access to AAC are: cerebral palsy, motor neurone disease, stroke, learning disabilities, autistic spectrum disorder, profound and multiple learning disabilities, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease and dimentia (Creer et al., 2016). AAC can be both aided and unaided: aided require the use of equipment or technology whereas unaided involve an understandable communication code such as eye blinks, gestures, or vocalizations (Beukelman & Light, 2020). This page will explore options for aided AAC that can be implemented in the general education classroom. 


Many professionals recommend evaluating assistive technology needs and implementing AAC in the class by using the SETT framework created by Joy Zabala (n.d.). To use SETT, teachers should consider the following in order: Student (strengths, needs and challenges) followed by Environment, Task, then Tools. When considering the least-restrictive option for AAC, Kravetz Bonnet (2015) recommends implementing low-tech or no-tech before high-tech tools, whereas Bugaj (2018) urges the IEP team to forego the technology continuum as the "ubiquity of high-tech devices no longer makes them less restrictive than carrying a paper-based support" (pp. 108-109).


AAC should be integrated into existing classroom routines as naturally as possible. Teachers should use their daily schedule and embed communication opportunities within it when students are highly motivated to interact (Kravetz Bonnet, 2015). Depending on the individual, this could include: morning circle time, snack time, delivering messages to people around the school, language arts, lunch time (e.g. practicing communication with staff in the cafeteria) and recounting activities and events of the day. AAC can also be incorporated into academic content, see below for resources on AAC for math, reading, and writing!


The 7 AAC tools explored on this page are: PECS, Widgit, Proloquo2go, Proloquo4text, LAMP Words for Life, Avaz and Sonoflex. My top 3 AAC apps can be found in the Teachers Tech Toolkit.

AAC for Academics

AAC for Reading

AAC for Reading

AAC for Reading

Learn more

AAC for Writing

AAC for Reading

AAC for Reading

Learn more

AAC for Math

AAC for Reading

AAC for Math

Learn more

Feature Matching Chart for AAC

Download PDF

AAC App Decision Tree

Download PDF

AAC Emergency Preparedness

An orange backpack with a first aid cross symbol leans against a tree

Prepare, Prevent, Prevail

The following information is advised by Kathryn Helland (2020) at AAC Community to help ensure safety and prevent undo anxiety for people who are nonverbal experiencing a crisis or emergency.

Prepare a Go Bag

Prepare emergency items including: a laminated backup copy of AAC vocabulary, a powerbank for the AAC device, medicine, snacks, water, insurance information. Also include a lanyard with key information such as name, contact details and specific communication needs. The lanyard may or may not include the individual's diagnosis, if preferred. Go Bags should also include a digital recording device with a prerecorded message that can be played over a phone for an emergency responder, for example "my name is --- and I have an emergency, I am nonverbal and use my --- to communicate, please ask me yes/no questions."

Back Up vocabulary

Regularly back up AAC vocabulary on the cloud and keep a copy on an external flash drive. To make a backup copy of AAC vocabulary simply print screenshots of AAC pages and remember that location of symbols is paramount.

Create a Support Network

Identify a network of trusted adults who regularly interact with the individual and could be relied upon in an emergency. Introduce the individual with AAC to staff at the local emergency room, urgent care, and police station prior to an emergency.

Practice Practice Practice

As with all important skills, practice them when everyone is feeling calm and safe. Read social stories about emergencies and roleplay AAC interactions with new and unfamiliar people to build up comfort and confidence.

Rationale and Reflection

Feature matching charts and decision trees evaluate the needs of the user to the features of the assistive technology, making them perfect tools when making decisions about AAC. Bugaj (2018) recommends a feature matching chart as a technique of intervention selection with the goal to ensure that learners are provided the necessary technology to access a Free Appropriate Public Education. Both feature matching charts and decision trees are useful during the IEP case conference or when discussing the procurement of new technology with the Special Education Team. The charts should be utilized on an individual basis to find the best tool for that child, however, when considering multiple students, the team may need to consider which apps or programs will suit the need of the highest number of students. The decision tree above illustrates that there is no perfect AAC app that will work for all students, but tools should be considered based on a number of factors including the student's strengths, weaknesses, and any circumstantial restrictions such as cost or platform. Most importantly, whenever we make decisions about technology, we must ask ourselves the following question: "of all the options, which is the least restrictive?" (Bugaj, 2018, p.107).

Explore More Apps

ISTE Educator Standard 2.0

ISTE Educator Standard 2.0

ISTE Educator Standard 2.0

By creating a feature matching chart or decision tree, the Special Education teacher meets criteria for the ISTE Educator Standard 2.0: Educators seek out opportunities for leadership to support student empowerment and success and to improve teaching and learning. This standard includes engagement with education stakeholders during the IEP case conference to advocate for equitable access for students with exceptionalities. The goal of the Feature Matching Chart is to model for colleagues the identification, exploration, evaluation, curation, and adoption of new digital resources and tools for learning (2(c)). The chart ensures that IEP team members systematically consider and review all AAC options before making a decision. In order to curate digital resources, we must become familiar with each option by first thoroughly exploring the tools available through physical trial (consider borrowing tools from PATINS Lending Library) or by exploring features digitally using each product website.

ISTE Student Standard 6.0

ISTE Educator Standard 2.0

ISTE Educator Standard 2.0

The ISTE Student Standard 6.0 is demonstrated in the AAC app decision tree: Students communicate clearly and express themselves creatively for a variety of purposes using the platforms, tools, styles, formats and digital media appropriate to their goals. It is important that teachers remain open-minded and explore AAC options that best fit the needs of the student. While a student who is nonverbal may not be able to "choose the appropriate platform and tools" (Standard 6(a)) it is important the the IEP team guide the student's selection by presenting a range of options to the stakeholders and exploring which technology best suits the individual student's needs. Where a student may struggle to produce intelligible and clear speech, AAC allows the student to be clearly understand by their communication partner, resulting in improved social inclusion and better quality of life (Creer et al., 2016). 

InTASC Standard 8

ISTE Educator Standard 2.0

InTASC Standard 8

Exploring AAC options demonstrates the InTASC standard 8: The teacher understands and uses a variety of instructional strategies to encourage learners to develop deep understanding of content areas and their connections, and to build skills to apply knowledge in meaningful ways. This standard is applied by actively teaching students to prepare for an emergency through roleplay, social stories, and making meaningful connections with emergency services. This is further demonstrated through Standard 8(q): the teacher values the variety of ways people communicate and encourages learners to develop and use multiple forms of communication. By preparing students with complex communication needs with a Go Bag that includes low and high-tech AAC as well as printed text and a voice-recording, the teacher ensures that the learner is protected and prepared. In doing so, the teacher demonstrates their value of accepting all communication forms, helping the student to make as many successful communication attempts as possible.

Sources

Beukelman, D., & Light, J. (2020). Augmentative & alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (5th ed.). Brookes Publishing.


Bugaj, C. (2018). The new assistive tech: Make learning awesome for all! International Society for Technology in Education.


Creer, S., Enderby, P., Judge, S., & John, A. (2016). Prevalence of people who could benefit from augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in the UK: Determining the need. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 51(6), 639–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12235


Helland, K. (2020, June 10). Emergency preparation for AAC. AAC Community. https://aaccommunity.net/2018/09/emergency-preparation-for-aac/


Tobii Dynavox LLC. (n.d.). Boardmaker - the power to achieve. Boardmaker. Retrieved February 27, 2021, from https://goboardmaker.com/


Zabala, J. (n.d.). Sharing the SETT framework. Joyzabala. Retrieved April 4, 2021, from http://www.joyzabala.com/Home.php


Copyright © 2021 Genevieve Gardner: Portfolio Project - All Rights Reserved.

All images courtesy of Shutterstock or Wenngage.

  • Home
  • Customized eBook
  • 3D Printer Grant
  • Teacher's Tech Toolkit
  • AAC
  • SMARTboard Modifications
  • Adaptive Hardware Prezi
  • Technology Infographic

Powered by GoDaddy